By popular demand, here is a bitesize Q&A on tariffs. In short, there are no winners from a trade war, but it is not too late to avoid a global recession. For now, ‘wait and see’ may be the best strategy both for central bankers and investors. 1. Do the new ‘reciprocal tariffs’ make any … Continue reading Thirteen questions and twelve answers on Trump’s tariff war
Category: financial markets
Trump’s ‘reciprocal tariffs’ make no economic sense
The Trump administration’s decision to impose additional tariffs on imports into the US is bad economics, motivated at least in part by bad politics. TTo recap, the new “reciprocal tariffs” will be set according to the 2024 figures for US trade in goods - completely ignoring trade in services. They are based on a formula … Continue reading Trump’s ‘reciprocal tariffs’ make no economic sense
Why the UK should cut tariffs on the US, not raise them
The siren calls for retaliation against the US if President Trump imposes new tariffs on the UK remind me of this exchange from 'Braveheart'.... Longshanks: Archers! English Commander: I beg pardon, sire. Won't we hit our own troops? Longshanks: Yes... but we'll hit theirs as well. The serious point here is that tariffs hurt people … Continue reading Why the UK should cut tariffs on the US, not raise them
No, the Spring Statement was not a ‘return to austerity’
First, the good news. Rachel Reeves’ Spring Statement is unlikely to do any significant harm to business or consumer confidence, and it was largely shrugged off by the financial markets. These days that is something at least to cheer. In particular, the Chancellor wisely resisted the siren calls to relax her fiscal rules to finance … Continue reading No, the Spring Statement was not a ‘return to austerity’
Plain-speaking Economics 