ITV’s Robert Peston has understandably made a lot of audit reports showing “£8.7 billion of losses on PPE [personal protective equipment] in government accounts”. There is plenty more ammunition here too for those claiming that there was a ‘pandemic of waste and fraud’, ‘contracts for mates’, and ‘Tory sleaze’. The reality, though, is a little more nuanced.
Peston rightly notes that the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has estimated that there has been a “loss in value of £8.7 billion of the £12.1 billion of PPE purchased in 2020-21”. But it would be wrong to attribute more than a small part of this accounting loss to ‘waste and fraud’.
The biggest chunk – about £4.7 billion – represents an “adjustment to the year-end valuation of PPE due to the market price of equivalent PPE at the year-end being lower than the original purchase price.”
Peston suggests that this means the DHSC paid above the going rate at the time it bought the PPE. That is misleading, or at least unfair. To quote from the original audit report (p. 182), “in early 2020-21, disruption to the PPE market, coupled with an unprecedented spike in demand, resulted in huge inflation in the price of goods and intense global competition to secure scarce supplies. The PPE market had begun to stabilise by 31 March 2021.”
In other words, when the UK government bought the PPE, market prices were much higher than they are now. That’s not really ‘over paying’.
What’s more, “a significant diminution in value due to change in market price was acknowledged as a possibility at the point of purchase, but was necessary to secure the required supplies of these vital items during a time of global and national crisis.”
Put another way, it was better to secure some PPE at a higher price, than much less (or none at all) at a lower price. There are good reasons to think that the government over-ordered (the NAO has queried why there was a need to commit to as much as five years of supply), but it seems like bad case of ‘wise in hindsight’ to say all this was wasted.
The second largest chunk of the accounting loss – £2.6 billion – is the writing down of the value of PPE which is not suitable for the original purpose, but might still be suitable for other uses. So at least some of this loss could be clawed back.
Of course, this still leaves a billion or more of definite waste, and a significant element of fraud. Too many took advantage of the (now infamous) ‘VIP lanes’. Wrongdoing here needs to identified and taken seriously (much more seriously, judging by the resignation statement made by Lord Agnew.) But it is still worth asking whether any government, of any political stripe, could have done any better.
History is littered with examples of wasteful (and sometimes fraudulent) government spending, under Labour as well as the Tories, particularly in areas such as housing, major IT projects, and defence procurement. The list is even longer if you add local governments and councils, many of which are already under the control of Labour or other parties.
The numbers may only be bigger now because the Covid pandemic required such a large expansion of the role of the state, and in public expenditure.
Nonetheless, the record on PPE adds to other evidence of weak controls on spending, including the extensive fraud in the furlough scheme, Eat Out to Help Out, and Covid loans.
This should help to lay to rest the myth that the Covid pandemic shows that the government can borrow and spend an enormous amount of money quickly and efficiently, which has become a popular trope on the Left. What may be necessary, or at least tolerable, in an extreme emergency is not the sort of model that should be retained in more normal times.
This article was first published by CapX on 2nd February 2022